I seem to have been nominated for a Mythopoeic Fantasy Award again. Woo woo!
(I'm betting that either Valiant or the "Bartimaeus Trilogy" will win it, though.)
I seem to have been nominated for a Mythopoeic Fantasy Award again. Woo woo!
(I'm betting that either Valiant or the "Bartimaeus Trilogy" will win it, though.)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 12:27 pm (UTC)I agree
Date: 2006-06-08 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 03:50 pm (UTC)Did you see that
no subject
Date: 2006-06-07 07:38 pm (UTC)The only thing on that list I'm not likely to vote for is By These Ten Bones. I really need to reread all three remaining works, since they're all good (but very, very different).
I'd say that Wizards at War is the most clasically mythopeic of the three -- moral questions? Check. Impingement of the divine on more ordinary reality? Check.
That said, a lot of its greatness lies in its context within the rest of the series, and both Valiant and the Bartemeus books have a lot of things going for them as well.