The Slut Vote
Nov. 11th, 2012 02:34 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Oh, cousins, you could NOT make this up. The theory espoused by this (almost certainly) Thin-Lipped White Guy With A Two-Dollar Haircut is that Romney lost because he didn’t get the Slut Vote.
Women make up about 54% of the electorate. It is very hard to win without winning that segment, or at least losing it only narrowly while winning men big. While the right usually wins married women, the fact is that married women constitute an ever-decreasing share of the female population. Women want to delay marriage as long as possible so they can “have it all,” and usually “have it all” means “have as much hot alpha sex as possible without any consequences.” And thus, less married women and more sluts (not that these two groups are mutually exclusive, per se)
This doesn’t begin to hint at what else is in this guy’s (unsuccessfully privatized) G+ posting. If you’re a person of color or a spoiled suburban brat-princess, he’s got you figured out too. Just go read it.
(eyeroll) I. can’t. …EVEN.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 02:42 pm (UTC)Thus do democracies fall. Democracy only works when the losers agree that they lost in a fair enough (it's never going to be perfect) election. The way the US is going, the Reublicans won't accept that they're losing because they're out of touch and the Democrats won't accept places where they lose because the system is going to be so patently unfair (seven hours waiting in line to vote? having the wrong polling day told yo ou in an automatic phone message? being stopped and harrassed by police on the way to the polling station on the basis of racial profiling, for no reason that brown people are likely to vote democrat and they want to delay them even more; electronic machines registering votes for Romney when you hit Obama on the touch-screen unless you hit the bottom 5% of Obama's box - pur happenstance that it went from Obama to Romney like that and didn't effect any other candidates, yes sir! Allegations that the voting machine manufacturers are in cahoots with one party and refusing to allow code audits by accredited professional bodies...)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-13 12:50 pm (UTC)without asking the leave of any damned fool man - or woman - unless that is her choice, too
and it's the job of damned near every adult to help bring up the kids so they make the best choices they can
- adult woman, man, martian or frizzy blue thing from betelgueuse
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 04:36 pm (UTC)Myself, I'm married and monogamous, and I vote too -- and, funny thing, I prefer to vote for the party that doesn't openly despise my friends who aren't married and/or monogamous.
One of the commenters on the Jezebel post you linked to described the original article as "the death rattle of the irrelevant." I rather like that.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 06:14 pm (UTC)Of course, not being an intended victim of the worldview of such people, he'd no doubt declare the likes of me utterly and completely brainwashed. Collateral damage of some sort.
SFX in Charles Schulz-style lettering: *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 06:29 pm (UTC)Or whether he's just so barking mad that the contradiction simply hasn't occurred to him.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 07:58 pm (UTC)Oh, that sexual revolution? It also gave Women the right to say No, to sex with people they didnt want to have sex with, and to getting married because it was expected of good girls.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 10:46 pm (UTC)Right, well, how nice of him to acknowledge that married women can be sluts too.
Posts like the one you quote keep presenting me with this freakish divide. On the one side are "sluts" who want both constant, consequence-free sex, and welfare payments for the babies with which they are overrunning the system. They are personally responsible for the entire national deficit. On the other side, not quite all by herself, is Michelle Duggar.
There is no middle ground. On the one side of the divide, even a single baby is evidence of irretrievable moral failing. On the other, any attempt to not have babies is just as bad.
There are no men involved. The role of the man in the species is to stand at a distance and lecture. It's a very important role, and men shouldn't be interrupted.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 02:23 am (UTC)I won't claim all Democrats are decent people who never hold freakish ideas, but what sane person couldn't understand that I prefer not to align myself with the party that people who think I am incapable of reason have aligned themselves with?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 07:42 am (UTC)You, sir, are Dave Sim and I claim my $5.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 04:48 pm (UTC)Yes,this delineates exactly why the Republicans lost the election!
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 10:42 am (UTC)