Page Summary
were-gopher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
casacorona.livejournal.com - (no subject)
natural20.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiveforsilver - (no subject)
ariaflame.livejournal.com - (no subject)
occams_pyramid - (no subject)
albireo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dakiwiboid.livejournal.com - I was just talking to my boss about something like this yesterday
cjmr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
giza.livejournal.com - (no subject)
siliconshaman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
uozaki.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sibylle - (no subject)
notosa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rabidfangurl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mithriltabby - (no subject)
gidget-ca.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dorianegray.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kayshapero - (no subject)
dewline.livejournal.com - Oh, This Again?
dershem.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 01:48 pm (UTC)I'd love to know what his definition of privacy is then.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:21 pm (UTC)What won't be possible at all soon is downloading your memory. The mri machines, at least for a long time, will only be able to register current brain activity. Old memories that you are not actively recalling are unlikely to be able to be retrieved any time soon.
Long before that, it will be possible to show on a screen a picture of what you are thinking about at the time. It may not be able to be very high resolution at first, and I guess there will be a profession of interpreting the blurry blobs the machine will probably give in early stages of development.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 06:49 pm (UTC)Not quite. Next up are skin scans (http://beamjockey.livejournal.com/95897.html).
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 01:50 pm (UTC)And you know that if Congress makes any rule about not profiling victims, Homeland Security will just seize every computer coming into the country.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:11 pm (UTC)That's not sufficient. Nuke the entire drive before crossing the border. Or preferably don't take anything across at all, note that any written materials can also be seized. You're reading a 'subversive' book, like Heinlein? Leave it at home. In fact, I doubt that even a Bible would be safe, because they have been used to smuggle subversive materials.
I'm waiting for the ruling which will mean that all travellers must be totally naked. After all, if bombs and papers can be hidden in shoes why not in any other clothing? As long as those pretty stewardesses also have to obey the rule I won't mind *g*...
And some people still wonder why I refuse to enter the USA...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:01 pm (UTC)No, you will mind. Because you will be naked, put into temporary hibernation and stacked tightly. After all, the only way to make you safe is to make sure you cannot deliberately do anything, and once you're unconscious, why have cabin crew any longer.
The only downside for the aviation industry is that it'll negate the wonderful SLF initialisation.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:23 pm (UTC)On Topic: okay, so I understand that if they get a laptop, they can look for things on it. (And I'm not saying they should.) But if I'm carrying, say, 1984, what would be the point of taking it? What can they possibly learn about me? I'd have to fight the urge to say "You must have a copy of this already. Isn't it your field manual?"
(Actually, I'm thinking they'd definitely take my copy of Finnegan's Wake, because they'd probably think it was some kind of code.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:25 pm (UTC)basically, under proposed legislation the telecoms companies will enable the DHS to intercept any emails etc coming in from abroad.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:41 pm (UTC)Of course, you still get a copy...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:45 pm (UTC)http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/intrusion_prevention/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208803214
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:30 pm (UTC)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh well, that's OK then. Just shouting keywords makes it quite alright doesn't it.
And in the age of the internet, it's ludicrously obvious security theatre.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:35 pm (UTC)I was just talking to my boss about something like this yesterday
Date: 2008-08-01 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:37 pm (UTC)I guess if I ever again take my digital camera out of the country, I'll be FedEx-ing my memory cards home, except for a blank/dummy with a couple boring pictures on to leave in the camera. And I won't be taking my laptop.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:26 pm (UTC)All the more reason to start encrypting my sensitive stuff with TrueCrypt (http://www.truecrypt.org/).
That being said, if my laptop is ever confiscated, I intend to file both a police report and an insurance claim.
I know that the police probably won't accomplish much, other than create another headache for DHS and maybe make them reconsider their decision.
The insurance claim would also be another way of putting pressure on them since, if my insurer were to reimburse me for my loss, chances are that they would then go after DHS for compensation.
I hope it never comes to that, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:30 pm (UTC)So, encrypting your stuff like that is just another way of saying 'send me to Guantanamo Bay.'
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:32 pm (UTC)I mean, at this rate the airline industry is going to collapse anyway, all these 'safety' features just keep driving the cost up, and driving passengers away...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:30 pm (UTC)Hm...wonder what they'd make of a USB stick full of the works of J. Irving Hancock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Irving_Hancock)...?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 09:07 pm (UTC)Not directly related to the content of the post itself, but....
Date: 2008-08-02 04:00 am (UTC)Oh, This Again?
Date: 2008-08-02 05:05 pm (UTC)As for the possible fallout of a successful ACTA negotiation, you don't ever want to go there...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 05:24 pm (UTC)