![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A prominent Chinese lawyer and collector unveiled an old map on Monday that he and some supporters say should topple one of the central tenets of Western civilization: that Europeans were the first to sail around the world and discover America.
The Chinese map, which was drawn in 1763 but claims to be a reproduction of an ancient map dated 1418, presents the world as a globe with all the major continents rendered with an exactitude that European maps did not have for another century and a half, after Columbus, Da Gama, Magellan, Dias and others had completed their renowned explorations.
I'm something of a map freak, and will be watching this with interest...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 11:43 am (UTC)That Columbus wasn't the first to return from visiting the Americas is pretty strongly accepted. I'm also not dismissive of the Chinese claim to have visited — if they had the ability to go long distance with big fleets of big ships, then North America would have been in reach. You can get from Beijing to San Fransisco without ever getting far from land, thanks to the Aleutian chain.
This, however, isn't the evidence — not on what's been presented, anyway.
A book about this
Date: 2006-01-17 12:43 pm (UTC)Re: A book about this
Date: 2006-01-17 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 02:56 pm (UTC)I don't find the idea that Zheng He found America before Columbus did to be inherently unbelievable, but this feels to me more like a centuries old fake than a legitimate discovery.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 02:58 pm (UTC)It will take a while
Date: 2006-01-17 07:12 pm (UTC)I watched a Nova or something a while ago about trying to validate a Vinland map--they did all that to it and more. And in the end I think the results were inconclusive on that one.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 07:26 pm (UTC)this was interesting story. did you read it?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 09:48 am (UTC)