The problem with e-Junkie which would have asked readers for $599.00 for each copy of the MS Reader version of A Wind from the South.
(I think moderately well of my work, but, guys, not THAT well.) ;)
(I think moderately well of my work, but, guys, not THAT well.) ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 10:58 pm (UTC)But what if you'd found someone willing to pay that? :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 11:19 pm (UTC)That way I can always say I have a book with me if I have my Handspring PDA.
=D
As for the headclutch... who knows, maybe someone willing to pay that much would figure "Maybe it's just THAT good". *teasing*
C.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 11:25 pm (UTC)As for the tease... (grin) Maybe someone would. But it would be wicked to take advantage: there's too much junk like that running around in the world as it is. (Today alone I received *twenty-three* "You have won Some Unlikely Lottery" spams.)
That said, if somebody wants to *purposefully* take leave of their senses, it's not like they can't use the PayPal link to do so. But bloody well I'll query them first. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 12:32 am (UTC)BTW - what camera does P use?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 10:43 am (UTC)Re Greenpeace: :) Why, what did they do? I must have missed something.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:09 am (UTC)There were quite a few howls from their members - I wonder why, that's only 8 years 4 months subs in one go.
The difference here is that Greenpeace took the money first, whereas your customers will have seen the price first and had a theoretical chance to back out. (Theoretical only, of course. Who can live without aWftS? Happily, we have the two hard copies from '95.)
Another recent case of mischarging was when Blizzard's first tranche of credit card payments for the World of Warcraft game appeared on credit cards as having been paid to one of a number of hotels, including the Swallow Hotel in Harrogate. A nice take on it is here, but at least (a) the right amount of money was deducted, and (b) it went to Blizzard, who knew they'd had it, and honoured it. It was only the credit card statements that came out wrong, but at least one person I know cancelled his card before he found out.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:22 am (UTC)Aha. Very cute - that looks like a pretty good compact. Having just bought a new (to me, second-hand) Nikon SLR, I was wondering about interchangeability of parts, and remember him playing with filters. But now I recall, he was hanging out of the window of the Café Huguenin with a filter hand held over the lens. So unless he happens to have 67mm filters, no.
(And why, oh why, does every camera use a different memory card? My Fuji uses Smart Media,
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:25 am (UTC)So [Unknown site tag] do you consider that you come out on top?? :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 11:41 am (UTC)But the question stands... (how is the new baby by the way?)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-13 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-14 12:06 am (UTC)