…And it’s fascinating.
Purported descendants of the Knights Templars are suing Pope Benedict for recognition of the seizure of a hundred billion Euros’ worth of their ancestors’ assets and property in the mid-1200s. (The seizure was secondary to accusations that the Order was heretical, and involved — among other things — in devil worship: but these accusations now usually thought to have been a smokescreen intended to allow the appropriation of the Templars’ great wealth.)
[Those suing the Pope] claim that, when the order was dissolved , more than 9,000 properties as well as other commercial enterprises belonging to the knights were appropriated by the church.
Their legal claim, they say, is just to "restore their good name." In a press release, the self-proclaimed "sons of the knights" declared, "We are not trying to cause the economic collapse of the Roman Catholic Church, but to illustrate to the court the magnitude of the plot against our Order."
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:01 pm (UTC)So, to have standing for this sort of suit, they clearly have to declare themselves as representing the interests of the Templars. It's a double-edged sword. If you can claim recompense for damages done TO the Order, then you can also be held responsible for damages they did to others. I think that in Round 2, a group out of the Middle East should press THEIR claim to whatever the Church owes the Templars, on the grounds that it was derived from wealth seized during the Crusades :)
After all, if the Templars were acting as part of the Church in the Crusades when they gathered the wealth, then moving it to a different part of the Church is just an internal matter. And if they were acting as on their /own/ when they gathered it, they were non-state actors in an armed conflict...ie, brigands. At least, one could amusingly make the case, with much high drama.
(That said, yes, everything I know about the period says that what happened to the Templars was pure dirty politics, and pretty ugly.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:15 pm (UTC)Or African American groups suing the US for crimes revolving around slavery?
Not that any of these groups have a chance of winning mind you...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:24 pm (UTC)As an aside: I can't help wondering how amused a certain other (fictional) Templar might be by all of this.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:28 pm (UTC)The Templars, on the other hand, were one of the most powerful political and economic forces of their day, made lots of enemies getting there, and eventually fell because those enemies made common cause against them. It's really not the same at all. The Templars, I think it can be argued, weren't oppressed...they played the power game and lost.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 10:29 pm (UTC)How is that any different to a company shutting down one of its factories and asset stripping it? It's not nice, but the assets didn't belong to the Templars in isolation; they belonged to them as part of the Church.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 10:41 pm (UTC)But what's next does the Catholic Church then sue the Queen Of England for all the lands Henry VIII seized?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 10:57 pm (UTC)Venal: corrupt
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 12:23 am (UTC)Very wow.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 08:00 am (UTC)Deeply messy idea.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 09:47 am (UTC)On a similar note makes me want to go back and re-read Focault's Pendulum. . .
no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 07:11 pm (UTC)And then back the other way to go after Stephen and Maud for the ungodly ruin they made of the place whilst fighting over the crown.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-07 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-08 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-08 03:43 pm (UTC)